![]() Blueprint of ReasonsĪ blueprint is a plan. A good precise opinion is vital to the reader’s comprehension of the goal of the essay. The precise opinion gives your answer to a question about the subject. Make sure you’ve chosen a subject that meets your instructor’s requirements for the assignment. ![]() ![]() The thesis statement has 3 main parts: the limited subject, the precise opinion, and the blueprint of reasons. What matters is that you have researched your subject, that you have found and engaged meaningfully with peer-reviewed academic sources, and that you are developing an evidence-based claim, rather than summarizing or giving unsupported opinion. What really matters is not guessing the magically correct words to fit some secret formula that your mean instructor is refusing to tell you. While the two authors disagree over, they both share a deep concern over. Once you have done the research, and you understand the subject, then a formula like the following won’t look like random words it will suggest a way to frame a nuanced, complex argument that goes beyond making non-controversial factual statements. If you are just starting out, and you are still developing an original, evidence-based claim to defend, a simpler formula is probably best. If you’re not sure whether you have a good thesis statement, see whether you can fit your ideas into one of these basic patterns. But it’s hard to go wrong if you put your thesis first. A complex thesis statement for a long paper may be part of a thesis paragraph. It’s not enough to disagree with someone else a strong paper will go beyond saying “Smith is wrong” and will instead say “Here’s a better solution that avoids problems P and Q that prevent Smith’s solution from working.”įor a short paper (1-2 pages), the thesis statement is often the first sentence.The more specific you are about how, specifically you will use Brown, the better. Rather than promising to “use Brown to argue” (which is too general), this model recommends that you “use Brown’s concept of X to argue” (or “Brown’s case study X” or “Brown’s thorough analysis of X” or “Brown’s unsuccessful rebuttal to Jones”).You might instead say “This paper will use…” or “Applying Brown’s concept of X will show…” Your instructor might not want you to use “I” in your paper.(Don’t automatically use “challenges a genre’s stereotype” in the hopes of coming up with the “correct” thesis.)Ī more complicated thesis statement for a paper that asks you to demonstrate your ability engage with someone else’s ideas (rather than simply summarize or react to someone else’s ideas) might follow a formula like this:Īlthough Smith says “quote a passage that makes a specific claim you intend to disagree with” (123), in this paper I will use Brown’s concept of X to argue that. Instead of claiming that a book “ challenges a genre’s stereotypes,” you might instead argue that some text “ provides a more expensive but more ethical solution than X” or “ undermines Jim Smith’s observation that ‘’”. There is nothing magically “correct” about a thesis on challenging a cultural stereotype. A less impressive blueprint might simply list the main points the essay will cover.A strong blueprint would hint at why these three details add up to support the thesis statement.Reasoning Blueprint: the three ways the book mounts this challenge are through attention to cultural detail, using Indian words, and using direct quotations from Black Elk.(a good thesis is debatable, so a good paper would also cover ways that this book perpetuates this same stereotype) Precise Opinion: the book challenges a stereotype.Topic: The representation of Indian lifestyle in the book Black Elk Speaks.The biography Black Elk Speaks challenges the Western genre’s stereotype of the “savage Indian” through its attention to cultural detail, its use of Indian words, and its direct quotes from Black Elk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |